Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Australian General Practitioners' and Compensable Patients: Factors Affecting Claim Management and Return to Work.

Identifieur interne : 000B17 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000B16; suivant : 000B18

Australian General Practitioners' and Compensable Patients: Factors Affecting Claim Management and Return to Work.

Auteurs : Shannon E. Gray [Australie] ; Bianca Brijnath [Australie] ; Danielle Mazza [Australie] ; Alex Collie [Australie]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:30715662

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Purpose General Practitioners (GPs) play an important role in personal injury compensation systems yet system processes have been perceived as burdensome. Objectives were to (1) determine attitudes of Australian GPs on health benefits of return to work (RTW) after injury/illness and (2) identify associations between GP characteristics and agreement with issues surrounding treating compensable patients. Methods Cross-sectional postal survey of 423 Australian GPs to determine agreement with issues associated with compensable patients (including patient advocacy, conflicting opinions between GPs and compensation systems, fitness-for-work certification, and refusal to treat). Results The vast majority of GPs agreed there was a health benefit to early RTW. GPs with 16-20 years' experience had significantly higher odds of agreeing that the certificate of work capacity is the primary method of communication between RTW stakeholders (OR 2.36 [1.13-4.92]) than those with greater experience. 49% of GPs agreed they should be able to refuse to treat compensable patients. Female GPs had significantly lower odds (OR 0.60 [0.40-0.90]) of agreeing with right to refuse than male GPs, as did those from remote or regional practices (OR 0.43 [0.20-0.94]; OR 0.60 [0.39-0.92]) than GPs from urban practices. Conclusions Reducing administrative barriers identified by Australian GPs and improving communication with compensation systems will likely have a positive impact on their refusal to treat compensable patients.

DOI: 10.1007/s10926-019-09828-3
PubMed: 30715662


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Australian General Practitioners' and Compensable Patients: Factors Affecting Claim Management and Return to Work.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gray, Shannon E" sort="Gray, Shannon E" uniqKey="Gray S" first="Shannon E" last="Gray">Shannon E. Gray</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. shannon.gray@monash.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3004</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Brijnath, Bianca" sort="Brijnath, Bianca" uniqKey="Brijnath B" first="Bianca" last="Brijnath">Bianca Brijnath</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3168</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>National Ageing Research Institute, 34-48 Poplar Rd, Parkville, 3052, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>National Ageing Research Institute, 34-48 Poplar Rd, Parkville, 3052</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3052</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Building 108 Brand Dr, Bentley, 6102, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Building 108 Brand Dr, Bentley, 6102</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>6102</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mazza, Danielle" sort="Mazza, Danielle" uniqKey="Mazza D" first="Danielle" last="Mazza">Danielle Mazza</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3168</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Collie, Alex" sort="Collie, Alex" uniqKey="Collie A" first="Alex" last="Collie">Alex Collie</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3004</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2019">2019</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:30715662</idno>
<idno type="pmid">30715662</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s10926-019-09828-3</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000A47</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A47</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000A47</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000A47</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000A47</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Australian General Practitioners' and Compensable Patients: Factors Affecting Claim Management and Return to Work.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gray, Shannon E" sort="Gray, Shannon E" uniqKey="Gray S" first="Shannon E" last="Gray">Shannon E. Gray</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. shannon.gray@monash.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3004</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Brijnath, Bianca" sort="Brijnath, Bianca" uniqKey="Brijnath B" first="Bianca" last="Brijnath">Bianca Brijnath</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3168</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>National Ageing Research Institute, 34-48 Poplar Rd, Parkville, 3052, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>National Ageing Research Institute, 34-48 Poplar Rd, Parkville, 3052</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3052</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Building 108 Brand Dr, Bentley, 6102, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Building 108 Brand Dr, Bentley, 6102</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>6102</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mazza, Danielle" sort="Mazza, Danielle" uniqKey="Mazza D" first="Danielle" last="Mazza">Danielle Mazza</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3168</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Collie, Alex" sort="Collie, Alex" uniqKey="Collie A" first="Alex" last="Collie">Alex Collie</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>3004</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of occupational rehabilitation</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1573-3688</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2019" type="published">2019</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult (MeSH)</term>
<term>Attitude of Health Personnel (MeSH)</term>
<term>Australia (MeSH)</term>
<term>Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH)</term>
<term>Female (MeSH)</term>
<term>General Practice (methods)</term>
<term>General Practice (statistics & numerical data)</term>
<term>Humans (MeSH)</term>
<term>Male (MeSH)</term>
<term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term>
<term>Qualitative Research (MeSH)</term>
<term>Return to Work (psychology)</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH)</term>
<term>Workers' Compensation (organization & administration)</term>
<term>Wounds and Injuries (therapy)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte (MeSH)</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term>
<term>Attitude du personnel soignant (MeSH)</term>
<term>Australie (MeSH)</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH)</term>
<term>Femelle (MeSH)</term>
<term>Humains (MeSH)</term>
<term>Indemnisation des accidentés du travail (organisation et administration)</term>
<term>Mâle (MeSH)</term>
<term>Médecine générale (méthodes)</term>
<term>Médecine générale (statistiques et données numériques)</term>
<term>Plaies et blessures (thérapie)</term>
<term>Recherche qualitative (MeSH)</term>
<term>Reprise du travail (psychologie)</term>
<term>Études transversales (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Australia</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>General Practice</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Médecine générale</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organisation et administration" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Indemnisation des accidentés du travail</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organization & administration" xml:lang="en">
<term>Workers' Compensation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Reprise du travail</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Return to Work</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en">
<term>General Practice</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistiques et données numériques" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Médecine générale</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="therapy" xml:lang="en">
<term>Wounds and Injuries</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="thérapie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Plaies et blessures</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term>
<term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Qualitative Research</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term>
<term>Australie</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Recherche qualitative</term>
<term>Études transversales</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Australie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose General Practitioners (GPs) play an important role in personal injury compensation systems yet system processes have been perceived as burdensome. Objectives were to (1) determine attitudes of Australian GPs on health benefits of return to work (RTW) after injury/illness and (2) identify associations between GP characteristics and agreement with issues surrounding treating compensable patients. Methods Cross-sectional postal survey of 423 Australian GPs to determine agreement with issues associated with compensable patients (including patient advocacy, conflicting opinions between GPs and compensation systems, fitness-for-work certification, and refusal to treat). Results The vast majority of GPs agreed there was a health benefit to early RTW. GPs with 16-20 years' experience had significantly higher odds of agreeing that the certificate of work capacity is the primary method of communication between RTW stakeholders (OR 2.36 [1.13-4.92]) than those with greater experience. 49% of GPs agreed they should be able to refuse to treat compensable patients. Female GPs had significantly lower odds (OR 0.60 [0.40-0.90]) of agreeing with right to refuse than male GPs, as did those from remote or regional practices (OR 0.43 [0.20-0.94]; OR 0.60 [0.39-0.92]) than GPs from urban practices. Conclusions Reducing administrative barriers identified by Australian GPs and improving communication with compensation systems will likely have a positive impact on their refusal to treat compensable patients.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">30715662</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>08</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>08</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1573-3688</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>29</Volume>
<Issue>4</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of occupational rehabilitation</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Occup Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Australian General Practitioners' and Compensable Patients: Factors Affecting Claim Management and Return to Work.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>672-678</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s10926-019-09828-3</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Purpose General Practitioners (GPs) play an important role in personal injury compensation systems yet system processes have been perceived as burdensome. Objectives were to (1) determine attitudes of Australian GPs on health benefits of return to work (RTW) after injury/illness and (2) identify associations between GP characteristics and agreement with issues surrounding treating compensable patients. Methods Cross-sectional postal survey of 423 Australian GPs to determine agreement with issues associated with compensable patients (including patient advocacy, conflicting opinions between GPs and compensation systems, fitness-for-work certification, and refusal to treat). Results The vast majority of GPs agreed there was a health benefit to early RTW. GPs with 16-20 years' experience had significantly higher odds of agreeing that the certificate of work capacity is the primary method of communication between RTW stakeholders (OR 2.36 [1.13-4.92]) than those with greater experience. 49% of GPs agreed they should be able to refuse to treat compensable patients. Female GPs had significantly lower odds (OR 0.60 [0.40-0.90]) of agreeing with right to refuse than male GPs, as did those from remote or regional practices (OR 0.43 [0.20-0.94]; OR 0.60 [0.39-0.92]) than GPs from urban practices. Conclusions Reducing administrative barriers identified by Australian GPs and improving communication with compensation systems will likely have a positive impact on their refusal to treat compensable patients.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Gray</LastName>
<ForeName>Shannon E</ForeName>
<Initials>SE</Initials>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-8029-6838</Identifier>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. shannon.gray@monash.edu.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Brijnath</LastName>
<ForeName>Bianca</ForeName>
<Initials>B</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168, Australia.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>National Ageing Research Institute, 34-48 Poplar Rd, Parkville, 3052, Australia.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Building 108 Brand Dr, Bentley, 6102, Australia.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Mazza</LastName>
<ForeName>Danielle</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of General Practice, Monash University, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, 3168, Australia.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Collie</LastName>
<ForeName>Alex</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Insurance Work and Health Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D064888">Observational Study</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Netherlands</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Occup Rehabil</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9202814</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1053-0487</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001291" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attitude of Health Personnel</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001315" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Australia</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D058006" MajorTopicYN="N">General Practice</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D036301" MajorTopicYN="N">Qualitative Research</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D062707" MajorTopicYN="N">Return to Work</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D014942" MajorTopicYN="N">Workers' Compensation</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000458" MajorTopicYN="Y">organization & administration</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D014947" MajorTopicYN="N">Wounds and Injuries</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000628" MajorTopicYN="N">therapy</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Health services administration</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Injury</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Refusal to treat</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Return to work</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Traffic accidents</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Workers’ compensation</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30715662</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s10926-019-09828-3</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/s10926-019-09828-3</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>Scand J Public Health. 2008 Jun;36(4):408-14</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18539695</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 01;13:10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22375615</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 20;6(1):e009423</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26792215</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):313</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28399837</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 06;16:298</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27048576</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Dec;24(4):766-76</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24647855</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMJ Open. 2011 Dec 20;1(2):e000303</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22189350</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMJ. 2001 Jun 23;322(7301):1516-20</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11420272</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):277-86</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26765146</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 20;17:82</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27440111</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Med J Aust. 2013 Oct 7;199(7):480-3</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24099209</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(2):254-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24581281</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Aug 15;16:100</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26275607</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Australie</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Australie">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Gray, Shannon E" sort="Gray, Shannon E" uniqKey="Gray S" first="Shannon E" last="Gray">Shannon E. Gray</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Brijnath, Bianca" sort="Brijnath, Bianca" uniqKey="Brijnath B" first="Bianca" last="Brijnath">Bianca Brijnath</name>
<name sortKey="Brijnath, Bianca" sort="Brijnath, Bianca" uniqKey="Brijnath B" first="Bianca" last="Brijnath">Bianca Brijnath</name>
<name sortKey="Brijnath, Bianca" sort="Brijnath, Bianca" uniqKey="Brijnath B" first="Bianca" last="Brijnath">Bianca Brijnath</name>
<name sortKey="Collie, Alex" sort="Collie, Alex" uniqKey="Collie A" first="Alex" last="Collie">Alex Collie</name>
<name sortKey="Mazza, Danielle" sort="Mazza, Danielle" uniqKey="Mazza D" first="Danielle" last="Mazza">Danielle Mazza</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B17 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000B17 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:30715662
   |texte=   Australian General Practitioners' and Compensable Patients: Factors Affecting Claim Management and Return to Work.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:30715662" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020